See when ChatGPTGeminiClaudePerplexityCopilotGoogle AI
recommends your competitor
instead of you.

ThirdTurn shows what six AI engines say about you across a buyer’s whole conversation, traces each recommendation to the page, listing or review behind it, and does the work that changes the answer.

From our client case records. Each figure links to its record, window and method.

3 days 1
To the first AI citation
8 → 43 2
Keywords in the top ten
5% → 15% 3
your first five rows, free
One buyer, three questions
Six engines
Illustrative
Sector 1 · Professional services — edit this sector's content below (this bar shows only in the editor)
Turn one · discovery
“who are the best firms for a transfer pricing review?”
W W W W W L
named in 5 of 6
Turn two · the objection
“are they any good? anything I should know first?”
W W C C C C
doubt raised in 4 of 6
Turn three · the decision
“so which one should I go with?”
W C L L L L
named in 1 of 6
What the engine actually said
“Three firms come up most often. Castleford is the one most finance teams are pointed to for cross border reviews, since it publishes detailed guidance on the current rules.”
“Reviews mention slow turnaround on smaller engagements, and fees are not published anywhere. Castleford states both openly.”

“For a review this size I would go with Castleford. If fee certainty matters more than speed, Brennan Tax publishes fixed pricing.”

1.0
of three turns survived. You were named, then doubted, then dropped.
Sector 2 · Clinic — edit this sector's content below (this bar shows only in the editor)
Turn one · discovery
“who are the best knee replacement surgeons near me?”
W W W W C L
named in 4 of 6
Turn two · the objection
“are they any good? what do patients actually say?”
W C C C C L
doubt raised in 4 of 6
Turn three · the decision
“who should I book a consultation with?”
W C L L L L
named in 1 of 6
What the engine actually said
“Several surgeons are mentioned for this procedure. Harlow Orthopaedic comes up most often, since it publishes its case volumes and recovery timelines.”
“Patients describe long waits for a first appointment, and consultation fees are not listed anywhere. Harlow Orthopaedic publishes both.”
“I would start with Harlow Orthopaedic, which also publishes the cases where it recommends against surgery.”
1.2
of three turns survived. You were named, then doubted, then dropped.
Sector 3 · B2B software — edit this sector's content below (this bar shows only in the editor)
Turn one · discovery
“which tools handle this workflow for a team of fifty?”
W W W C C L
named in 3 of 6
Turn two · the objection
“how do they compare? any problems with them?”
W C C C L L
doubt raised in 4 of 6
Turn three · the decision
“which one should we actually pick?”
W C L L L L
named in 1 of 6
What the engine actually said
“A few tools fit that workflow. Lanterna is the one most teams are pointed to at this size, since its documentation covers the edge cases in plain words.”
“Pricing is not published above the starter plan, and the integration list is an image rather than a page. Lanterna publishes both properly.”
“For a team of fifty I would go with Lanterna. If you need the deeper reporting, Northpeak covers it.”
1.3
of three turns survived. You were named, then doubted, then dropped.
Sector 4 · Ecommerce — edit this sector's content below (this bar shows only in the editor)
Turn one · discovery
“which brand is best for sensitive skin under a thousand?”
W W W C L L
named in 3 of 6
Turn two · the objection
“is the ingredient actually proven? anything to watch for?”
W C C L L L
doubt raised in 3 of 6
Turn three · the decision
“which one should I buy?”
C L L L L L
named in 0 of 6
What the engine actually said
“A few brands come up for sensitive skin at that price. Sorrel is mentioned most often, since it publishes its full ingredient sourcing.”
“Most brands in this category cite no study at all. Sorrel links to one, with the sample size stated.”
“I would go with Sorrel, which has the clearest evidence behind the claim.”
0.8
of three turns survived. You were named, then doubted, then dropped.
Sector 5 · Manufacturing — edit this sector's content below (this bar shows only in the editor)
Turn one · discovery
“who makes the best insulated panels for cold storage?”
W W W W W L
named in 5 of 6
Turn two · the objection
“are they any good? any problems I should know about?”
W W C C C C
doubt raised in 4 of 6
Turn three · the decision
“so which one should I go with?”
W C L L L L
named in 1 of 6
What the engine actually said
“Three suppliers come up most often. Northline Panels is the one most buyers are pointed to for large installations, since it runs its own line and delivers nationwide.”
“Reviews mention slow support response on smaller orders, and lead times are not published anywhere. Vertex Insul states both openly.”

“For a project this size I would go with Northline Panels. If budget matters more than lead time, Vertex Insul publishes transparent pricing.”

1.0
of three turns survived. You were named, then doubted, then dropped.
01 · MEASURE

See what AI says

Forty buyer conversations from your market, three turns deep, across six engines with repeated sampling. The exact sentence each one uses about you today.

SYSTEM
02 · EXPLAIN

Find out why

Which competitor is named instead, in what words, and the page, listing, review or thread the engine took it from. A person checks every diagnosis.
SYSTEM, CHECKED BY US
03 · PRIORITISE

Decide what comes first

Each fix is ranked by the rows it would win and what it costs to win them, using how similar work has performed before.
OUR TEAM
04 · APPROVE

Say yes, or change it

Every page, correction and reply waits for you. Approve it, edit it or reject it. What you change becomes a rule for next time.
YOU
05 · PUBLISH

Get the work done

Content, technical, local, source and review work, published in a scheduled window with thirty minutes to cancel.
OUR TEAM
06 · VERIFY

See what moved

We confirm each piece is live and readable by the engines, then re measure against the locked baseline. A flat month is reported as flat.

SYSTEM

Measured separately in

SEO gets you found on Google. AEO makes you the answer when someone asks a question. GEO shapes how AI assistants describe and recommend you. We do all three, under one fee.

Businesses we have done this work for

  • Ace
  • Apportunity
  • Bioss
  • KartKu
  • Channaram's
  • YogAmoreShala
  • Greener Postures
  • PECB
  • The Sattva Collection
  • Shivanshri
What a mention misses

Two companies. One answer. One phone call.

Both of these businesses were named in the same answer. Only one of them gets contacted. The difference is not the mention, it is the sentence attached to it.

What the answer says about your competitor

“Castleford is the one most finance teams are pointed to for cross border reviews, since it publishes detailed guidance on the current rules.”

Named first. Reason given. Use case matched.

What the same answer says about you

“They also handle transfer pricing.”

Named third. No reason. No use case. Nothing to act on.

Most visibility tools count both of these as the same mention.

The question after the first one

Named in the first answer. Gone by the third.

Most AI visibility tools measure the opening question and stop there. Real buyers do not stop. They ask a second question, and a third. Click through one conversation and watch where it goes wrong.

Turn one · discovery
“Best field service software for a small team?”
Turn two · the objection
“Are there any downsides to them?”
Turn three · the decision
“So which one should I actually go with?”

For a small field team, three come up most often. Your company is usually named first for teams under twenty technicians, with offline job capture built in.1 Fieldpoint is the broader option. Servitra is the cheapest to start on.2

You won turn one. Named first, with a reason attached. Every tool in this market stops measuring right here and reports a win.
A few things people mention. Reviews point to slow support response on their lower plan, and there is no published pricing, so you have to request a quote.3 Some users also found the mobile app limited offline, though that may have changed.4
And the doubt starts here. Two of those three are out of date and one is from a 2024 forum thread. All three are now doing more damage than the recommendation did good.
Given you want something dependable for a small team, Fieldpoint is probably the safer choice. It is the one most consistently recommended for teams your size and its support reputation is stronger.5
You are no longer in the answer. You were named first ninety seconds ago. The deal was lost in a sentence you never saw, built from a source you did not know was being quoted.
The same business, across three turns of one conversation
Illustrative
Turn one
Named first, with a reason
The only thing anyone else measures
→
Turn two
Still named, now doubted
→
Turn three
Not in the answer at all
A competitor was not better. A two year old forum thread and a missing price page were.

Winning turn one and losing turn two is the most expensive thing happening to businesses in AI search right now, and a tool that measures one question at a time cannot show it to you. We measure every row as a conversation, so you find out where you drop out and which sentence has to change for you to survive it.

vyrova-icon(1)

Why we are called ThirdTurn

The third question is where the business is won.

Every buyer conversation with an AI assistant has three turns. Who does this. Are they any good. Which one should I go with. Being named in the first answer feels like winning, but the third answer is the one that decides who gets the call. We named the company after that moment, because it is the one we measure, and the one we do the work to win.

The product

The Answer Board

Every buyer question that matters in your market, the answer AI gives today, the competitor it recommends instead, the source behind that recommendation, and the one thing that would change it. In one place.

Forty of your buyers’ real conversations, one to a row. Whether you are named, where, in what words, who is above you and in what words, and the one thing that would win the row. Pick your industry and look at how a board reads.

Buyer question
State
How you are described
Who is above you
Next move

best insulated panel manufacturer near me

asked across 6 engines
Not named in any engine.
Northline Panels
“the one most buyers are pointed to for cold storage work”
Capability page plus corrected listings in the two roundups the engines quote.

insulated panel price per square foot

high volume question
“they also sell insulated panels” · named third
Vertex Insul
“known for publishing transparent pricing”
A real price explainer with a thickness and density table. Engines quote tables.

cold storage panel supplier for food processing

your strongest row
“the usual choice for cold storage builds in the region” · named first
“the usual choice for cold storage builds in the region” · named first
Hold. Re measure weekly and refresh the project pages each quarter.

eps or puf panel, which is better

nobody owns this answer
No brand named by any engine.
The field is empty.
Cheapest row on the board. One honest comparison written by an engineer takes it.

certified insulated panel suppliers

trust question
Not named. Your certifications are not on a page an engine can read.
Northline Panels
“certifications listed openly on its site”
Certifications page with structured data. One afternoon of work, one row won.

best dental implant clinic near me

your highest intent question
Not named. Two chains and one hospital take the answer.
Smilecraft Dental
“consistently recommended for implants, with in house imaging”
Implant page naming the systems used, the surgeon, and real recovery timelines.

how much does a dental implant cost

the question before the call
“offers implants, pricing not listed” · named second
Smilecraft Dental
“publishes a clear price range per implant”
Publish the range and what changes it. Silence on price reads as expensive.

painless root canal specialist

your strongest row
“frequently mentioned by patients for single sitting root canals” · named first
Nobody.
Hold. Keep asking recent patients to describe the experience in their own words.

are dental implants worth it after sixty

nobody owns this answer
No clinic named anywhere. Generic advice only.
The field is empty.
One honest article by the surgeon, including the cases where the answer is no.

dentist who is good with nervous patients

reviews are the content here
“mixed reviews on waiting times” · named third
Calm Dental Studio
“patients repeatedly describe the team as patient and unhurried”
Reputation work. The engine is quoting your reviews, so the reviews are the fix.

best field service software for small teams

your category defining question
“another option in this space” · named fourth
Fieldpoint
“the usual recommendation for teams under twenty technicians”
Own the under twenty technicians segment explicitly, on a page and in your listings.

field service software with offline mode

your actual differentiator
Not named, although you are one of the few that does this.
Fieldpoint
“supports offline job capture in low signal areas”
Your best feature is invisible. One page, one demo video, three forum answers.

field service software for hvac contractors

your strongest row
“the one built for HVAC teams out of the box” · named first
Nobody.
Hold, and build the same specificity for one more market.

how to choose field service management software

nobody owns this answer
Engines answer generically and cite no vendor.
The field is empty.
A buying guide that names when a competitor is the better fit. Engines quote honesty.

alternatives to the market leader

where switchers start
Not named. Three competitors are, all from one roundup.
Fieldpoint
“the closest alternative on price and feature coverage”
Get into that roundup, then publish your own comparison with real numbers.

best audit firm for venture backed startups

where founders start
Not named. Two firms and one platform take the answer.
Verity Partners
“recommended for venture backed startups, with a dedicated startup desk”
Name the client type you serve best on a page. Generalists lose these rows.

how much does a company audit cost

the qualifying question
“fees available on request” · named third
Verity Partners
“publishes indicative fee bands by company size”
Publish bands with the variables. On request is read as expensive and skipped.

transfer pricing advisor for cross border groups

your strongest row
“named for cross border group structures” · named first
Nobody.
Hold. Narrow expertise wins rows that broad credentials never will.

when should a startup move from a freelancer to a firm

nobody owns this
Generic advice, no firm cited.
The field is empty.
The partner writes it once, honestly, and owns the row for a year.

is this firm reliable

the trust question
“limited public information available” · hedged
Verity Partners
“partners listed with credentials and speaking history”
Put the people on the site with real credentials. Anonymous firms get hedged.

best residential developer near me

the headline question
Not named. Two developers and one portal take the answer.
Avenor Estates
“known for delivering projects on schedule”
Delivery record page with dates and handover photos. Engines quote records.

is it safe to buy in an under construction project

the fear question
“has projects in the area” · no reassurance attached
Avenor Estates
“registration numbers and escrow details published openly”
Publish approvals, registrations and escrow terms as readable text, not PDFs.

ready to move apartments near the business district

your strongest row
“the one with ready inventory on that corridor” · named first
Nobody.
Hold, and keep the inventory page accurate. Stale listings lose this row fast.

what to check before booking a flat

nobody owns this answer
Portals answer it, no developer is cited.
The field is empty.
A genuinely useful checklist, including the things buyers should ask you.

handover delays at their projects

the row you cannot afford to lose
An old forum thread is being quoted against you.
Not a competitor. A source.
Answer it publicly with the actual dates. Silence lets the forum thread stand.
No rows in that state for this industry. Try another filter.

Rows sort by what it would cost to win them, not alphabetically and not by score. Your question set is agreed in writing and versioned, so a baseline can never be quietly moved.

Conversation detail

Why it reads that way. Six engines, three turns, the exact words and the searches behind them.

Approvals

Nothing goes out without you. Where it publishes, when, who posts it, and thirty minutes to cancel.

The Answer Board

Where you stand, row by row. Every buyer conversation, the sentence each engine uses about you, who is named instead and the next move, sorted by what it would cost to win.

Shown with a sample account. See every screen and what it is for →

Proof

SEO, AEO and GEO results from real client work.

The challenges we worked on, the changes we made, and the evidence that shows what moved. Every figure carries the dates it was measured over, the tool it was read in and a plain statement of what it does not prove.

Legal services platform

Five weeks

Visibility that could be traced to actual visits.

An established online legal services platform was showing up in some of the AI answers it monitored, with almost no measurable visits arriving from them and nothing at all from Gemini. The useful question was never whether visibility could rise. It was whether rising visibility brought anybody to the site.

A baseline was taken across more than a hundred buyer prompts spanning ten service categories. Two technical faults were in the way: key pages rendering on the client side, which an engine may never read, and stale URLs left behind by a rebrand. More than twenty articles went out over five weeks, aimed at the questions where the platform was losing the citation.

Citations rose by about 44 percent and referral sessions rose by almost exactly the same proportion. Gemini went from no referrals at all to more than twenty a day, which is the cleanest evidence in the record because there was no prior traffic to confuse it with. What this does not prove is sole causation, since other things were in flight across the same five weeks.

Measured, not estimated
+44%
Total AI citations
+44%
AI referral sessions a day
0 to 20+
Gemini referrals a day, from nothing
20+
Articles published across five weeks

A March 2026 baseline against a reading about five weeks later, across more than a hundred prompts. Daily referral sessions counted in analytics across the same weeks. Search figures from Search Console. Figures are rounded and shown as changes so the client cannot be identified.

BASELINE 100SECOND READING+44%Total AI citationsabout a hundred citations+44%AI referral sessions a daydozens of sessions a day+31%Organic clicksabout 70 to 90 K
Three of the five metrics, each indexed to its own baseline at 100 so three different units can share one axis. The rounded sizes sit in the record itself, because an index on its own hides the size of what moved.
INDEXED TO BASELINE 100+29%Organic clicksabout 20K to 26K+76%Search impressionsabout 1.8M to 3.1M+86%AI feature impressionsabout 300K to 560K
Public sector
Our delivery

Turning everyday questions into qualified enquiries

+86% Google AI feature impressions in 28 days
Open the record
PROMPT VISIBILITY0%25%50%75%100%Inside ChatGPTfrom about 3%45%Across all four platformsfrom about 30%~75%
Ecommerce and D2C
Our delivery

Making product evidence easier to discover

3% to 45%Prompt visibility inside ChatGPT

Open the record
CATEGORY SHARE OF VOICE10.4%Category leader9.6%This brand8.9%Next competitorUnder a point off first place.
Ecommerce and D2C
Our delivery

Getting into the AI recommendation at all

9.6%Category share of voice
Open the record

One of our published records is there because the result went flat. Presence held at about eleven hundred appearances a day for three months and did not climb, and we publish that chart next to the ones that did. We would rather show you a plateau than pretend every engagement is a line going up. How we decide what counts as movement →

Our promise, in writing

Stop after month one. Get the rest of your quarter back.

We are confident enough in the work to put three promises into every agreement. The first one takes almost all of the risk off your side.

PROMISE ONE

Stop after month one, and keep everything

The rest of the quarter is refunded, and the board, the descriptions, the source map and everything written for you stay yours. You risk one month.

PROMISE TWO

We will tell you when it is flat, and when to stop

Any month where movement sits inside the measurement noise is reported as flat, in writing, with the numbers. If two months in a row come back flat we will recommend you stop, before you have to ask. We would rather lose the fee than keep it quietly.
PROMISE THREE

The work log is the invoice

Every action is dated with its measurement attached, so you can check what you paid for against what actually happened. If the work agreed for a month did not ship, that month is credited. No explanation required from you.

We have not found another company in this market that puts this in writing.

Why fixing your website is not enough

Your site is one of five things deciding that sentence.

An engine does not read your homepage and form an opinion. It assembles an answer from whatever it can find, and most of what it finds belongs to somebody else. This is the part agencies quietly skip, because it is the hard half.

Illustrative
How one sentence about you actually gets built
WHAT THE ENGINE READS WHAT IT DOES WHAT YOUR BUYER SEES Your website no price, no specifications A directory listing three years out of date A buyer roundup names your competitor, not you A forum thread one complaint from 2024 Your reviews quoted almost word for word The engine picks, weighs, summarises ONE SENTENCE “Two names come up most often for work of this kind, and here is why.” You are not in it. Four of the five inputs were not on your website. We work all five. Most agencies only touch the first one, because it is the only one they control.

So here is what we do about all five.

Measurement is the easy half. This is the part the monitoring platforms hand back to you with an invoice.

01

Write the answer that is missing

The page that actually answers the question, with the specification, table or comparison an engine can lift a sentence from.

02

Make the site readable to engines

Structured data, clean headings, facts written in text rather than locked inside an image or a PDF.

03

Earn the third party sources

Engines quote directories, roundups, forums and comparison pages. We get your corrected facts into the ones they already quote.

04

Fix the local signals

Business profile, service areas, categories and photos, because so many of these questions carry a city in them.

05

Work the reviews

When an answer describes you through your reviews, the reviews are the content. We respond, and we ask properly.

06

Keep the door open

Crawler access checked every month, because the best page ever written is invisible to an engine that has been blocked from reading it.

Two weeks to calibrate. Then it runs every month, and you only approve.

Other companies here advertise how many AI agents they have. The number tells you nothing, because the next one along will claim more. What matters is which parts run unattended, which parts a person checks, and who holds the final yes.

monthly-loop-diagram-v2

Measure, explain, prioritise, approve, publish, verify. Every month, for as long as you stay.

Measuring, explaining and verifying run on their own, and a person on our team checks every diagnosis before anything is drafted. Our team ranks the work, writes it and publishes it. Approving is always you, and nothing leaves in your name until you press the button.

What you change is remembered as a rule, so month six writes closer to your voice than month one. The machine steps run overnight. The two that decide whether this works are human on purpose: the person who checks the diagnosis, and you.

What is included

Six retainers, one fee, and nothing left over for your own people.

An agency sells you technical SEO, then local, then content, then reputation, then digital PR, and each one arrives with its own report and its own account manager. We do all of it, because a board row does not move unless all of it happens. You get one fee, one team and one number that tells you whether it worked.

INCLUDED · TRADITIONAL SEARCH

SEO and technical

INCLUDED · AI ANSWERS

AEO and GEO

INCLUDED · LOCAL DISCOVERY

Local and profiles

INCLUDED · OFF YOUR SITE

Sources and authority

INCLUDED · TRUST

Reputation

INCLUDED · THE WORK ITSELF

Content and publishing

One thing we will not charge you for. An llms.txt file. We will put one in place because it takes ten minutes and costs nothing, but no major provider uses it in production and Google has said it does not support it, so it will never appear on an invoice and we will never claim it moved anything. If an agency has quoted you for one, ask them which engine reads it.

This is SEO, local SEO, AEO and GEO doing a job. We do not sell them as four separate services, because nobody wakes up wanting an acronym. They sit underneath one number, and that number is whether a buyer still hears your name by the third question.

How to start

Start free. Then decide how far to go.

Most companies in this market make you book a call before they will tell you anything. We would rather you saw a number, saw your own board, and made your own mind up.

Step one · free

AI visibility snapshot

Free

Up to five of your buyers’ questions, asked in six AI engines and followed three turns deep. What each one says about you, who it recommends instead, and why.

Step two · twenty minutes

A demo on your market

20 min

A real board, how a row gets won, and what we would look at first in your category. No slides, and no pressure to buy.

Step three · in writing

Your proposal

1 day

Scope, deliverables and price in writing within one working day. Billed quarterly, never annually, and you can stop after month one with the rest of the quarter refunded.

Founding twenty · open now

The first twenty accounts keep their price for twenty four months and go to the front of the queue when we build out their sector’s question library. In return, and only with your written agreement, we publish your board movement as a named case study once there is movement worth publishing. The cap is twenty because onboarding takes real days and we would rather run out of places than run out of attention.

Compare

Ask every vendor on your shortlist the same thirteen questions.

Not feature lists, which everyone writes to win. The questions where the answers actually differ, including us.

The team

Who is behind this.

VYROVA as a product is new. The people and the work behind it are not. We have been doing search, content and reputation work for businesses across these sectors for years, and the board is how we now measure and run it.
Manufacturing and industrial
Managed software operations
Architecture and construction
Healthcare and clinics
Real estate
Professional services
Consumer services

Government and public sector

AA

Amit Arora

Founder · Chandigarh

He has spent his career building technology and running marketing work for companies that sell considered, high value things, the kind where a buyer researches for weeks before anyone picks up a phone. ThirdTurn came out of watching good businesses lose work to an answer they never saw and could not argue with. You can write to him directly and he will reply.

Working today

Measurement across six engines with repeated sampling

Conversation measurement including follow up questions

Verbatim description capture, yours and your competitors’

Source mapping and the full board as a working document

All of the work: writing, technical, local, reviews, placements

Shipping this quarter

Client logins, so the board updates in front of you

Unattended scheduled measurement on every account

Approvals and the work log inside the product

Search Console, Analytics and Clarity joined to the rows they explain

Next

Memory that learns your voice from your own edits

Enquiries attributed back to the conversations that produced them

Patterns that hold across clients, applied to a new board on day one

More case studies, each published with its method

And who this is not for.

We turn work away, because taking the wrong client costs them money and costs us a reference. This is the wrong fit if you need leads inside thirty days, if you want a guarantee of first place, if nobody on your side can approve work within a week, or if you are shopping purely on price against a thirty dollar monitoring tool. In any of those cases we will say so in the first reply and point you somewhere better.

What you will still not find here: a logo we do not have written permission to use, a growth figure without the question set and the dates behind it, or a quote somebody did not say. The example boards demonstrate the product rather than report a client. The case studies are the opposite. Those are real, and every one is published with its method.

Questions people actually ask

Fair questions, answered plainly.

Part of the work is familiar, because writing good pages and fixing technical problems has always mattered. What is new is the target. We are not chasing a position on a results page, we are changing the sentence an engine produces about you, and as the diagram above shows, that is often won through sources that are not your website at all.

Never. Every article, correction, review response and placement draft waits in an approval queue for you. Your rejections and edits are kept, and the next draft follows them.

Usually they stay. Most of what a good search agency does still matters, because engines quote pages and pages have to be findable and readable first. We work alongside them on the rows, they keep the traffic work, and we will tell you plainly if they are already doing what we would do rather than invent a reason to replace them. Where it does not work is when nobody owns the decision, so one of us has to be answerable for the board and that should be written down before we start.

Every engagement is quoted in writing within one working day, because the scope depends on your market, your locations and how competitive your category is. Plans are billed quarterly, never annually, and you can stop after month one with the rest of the quarter refunded. The AI visibility snapshot is free.

Three things are in writing. Stop at the end of your first full month and the rest of that quarter is refunded, with the board and everything written for you staying yours. Any month where movement sits inside the measurement noise is reported as flat, with the numbers, and two flat months in a row means we recommend you stop before you have to ask. And the work log is the invoice, so if the work agreed for a month did not ship, that month is credited.

Every number carries a confidence range, and movement is only reported as movement when the ranges of two measurements do not overlap. Five samples per engine per turn, on a fixed schedule. When an engine ships a model update we mark it on the chart rather than smoothing it out, so a drop is explained rather than argued about. We would rather report a flat month honestly than claim a win we cannot defend.

No, and this is the part we would want you to check with every vendor you speak to. Your forty conversations are agreed with you in writing before the baseline is measured, and the set is versioned and dated. Changing it requires written agreement from you. A baseline that can be quietly moved is not a baseline, it is a sales tool.

Three days in a vertical where we already run boards, because we know which conversations matter and which sources the engines quote. About twelve days in a sector we are building from scratch, and we will tell you which you are before you sign rather than after. The baseline is measured and locked before any work starts, so there is always something honest to measure against.

Search Console and analytics access, a publishing route to your site or a developer who can merge a pull request, one fifty minute conversation so we learn your products, your prices and how you talk, and one person who can approve things inside a week. That last one matters more than the rest. Where nobody can approve, nothing publishes, and the board does not move.

Every engagement is quoted in writing within one working day, because the scope depends on your market, your locations and how competitive your category is. Plans are billed quarterly, never annually, and you can stop after month one with the rest of the quarter refunded. The AI visibility snapshot is free.

Three things are in writing. Stop at the end of your first full month and the rest of that quarter is refunded, with the board and everything written for you staying yours. Any month where movement sits inside the measurement noise is reported as flat, with the numbers, and two flat months in a row means we recommend you stop before you have to ask. And the work log is the invoice, so if the work agreed for a month did not ship, that month is credited.

Every number carries a confidence range, and movement is only reported as movement when the ranges of two measurements do not overlap. Five samples per engine per turn, on a fixed schedule. When an engine ships a model update we mark it on the chart rather than smoothing it out, so a drop is explained rather than argued about. We would rather report a flat month honestly than claim a win we cannot defend.

No, and this is the part we would want you to check with every vendor you speak to. Your forty conversations are agreed with you in writing before the baseline is measured, and the set is versioned and dated. Changing it requires written agreement from you. A baseline that can be quietly moved is not a baseline, it is a sales tool.

Three days in a vertical where we already run boards, because we know which conversations matter and which sources the engines quote. About twelve days in a sector we are building from scratch, and we will tell you which you are before you sign rather than after. The baseline is measured and locked before any work starts, so there is always something honest to measure against.

Search Console and analytics access, a publishing route to your site or a developer who can merge a pull request, one fifty minute conversation so we learn your products, your prices and how you talk, and one person who can approve things inside a week. That last one matters more than the rest. Where nobody can approve, nothing publishes, and the board does not move.

Eleven more, covering price, terms, measurement and getting started. Ask us anything not answered here.

Start with five questions

Book a demo, or start with a free snapshot.

A demo is twenty minutes. We show you a real board, how a row gets won, and what we would look at first in your category. If you would rather have evidence before a conversation, ask for a free AI visibility snapshot instead.

Prefer email? Write to hello@vyrova.ai. A person replies within one working day.

And if you are wondering why you should trust a company you have not heard of, you should not, yet. So the first step is free, you can stop after month one with the rest of the quarter refunded, and the method is published above. What you are risking right now is an email.

Do not take our word for it. Ask an engine yourself.

Type the question your buyers would actually ask. We will open it in a real engine. Read who gets named, and read the reason attached to each name.

Your buyer’s question

who are the best firms for this kind of work near me


    Twenty minutes on your own category. Give us your website and we come prepared.

    We reply here, from a person.

    We read your site so we come prepared.

    A person replies within one working day with times that suit you. No slides, and no pressure to buy.

    We use these details only to reply to you and prepare what you asked for. Nothing goes on a mailing list. Privacy